Recent studies have explored the potential of multimodal large language models for robot control, yet the models' embodied capabilities remain insufficiently characterized across models, tasks, and execution settings. We conduct a multidimensional comparative evaluation on RoboColiseum across four tracks: Instruction Following, Spatial Reasoning, General Manipulation, and Robustness. We implement Agent2Act, a control harness that integrates GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5, and Gemini 4 Argon into the evaluation environment through shared observation, action execution, and feedback interfaces. Under common task settings and scoring criteria, all four models exhibit a consistent capability profile: high instruction-following scores, with three approaching perfect performance; strong spatial reasoning; and general manipulation scores below those of the other three tracks. Within the evaluated configurations, Astra leads instruction following and robustness, while Opus leads spatial reasoning, general manipulation, and overall performance. These results reveal complementary strengths across models and a persistent gap between task understanding and reliable physical execution. Component comparisons on selected tasks further show that harness design affects task success, planning cost, and execution time. Additionally, case studies with Astra examine whole-body coordination, manipulation across robot embodiments, precision manipulation, dexterous-hand manipulation, and real-robot tasks, providing further insight into the model's capabilities and limitations across embodied tasks.

翻译：暂无翻译