AI is expanding what researchers can produce. A substantial increase in scientific output would also change how that work is organised and distributed, as earlier shifts in the scale of science have done. This paper develops a thought experiment around Collaborative Debating Models (CDMs), topic-focused environments where researchers work with AI and one another to pursue questions and maintain an evolving account of their field. Individual contributions would remain attributable as ongoing debate and further analysis change the shared account. The paper considers how journals could evolve into these gathering places and how different forms of ownership would shape scientific agendas and the support for continuing work. CDMs could connect participants to remote laboratories and other research services to conduct new studies, with shared repositories making the resulting data available for further inquiry. The proposal links expanded scientific production to collective interpretation through continuing assessment and revision, while leaving room for disciplinary differences in how contributions are reviewed and recognised.

翻译：暂无翻译