Label-space expansion - predicting a larger joint space and summing back to the original labels - is a natural design for multi-label facial expression recognition, but its failure modes have not been characterised. We evaluate Condition-Aware Label Expansion (CALE) on a self-built dataset (30,240 training images, 3,460 multi-label test images), on seven backbones, and on the public RAF-DB and RAF-ML benchmarks. The central finding is that the aggregation rule, not the representation, decides whether the method works. With a fixed threshold of 0.5, the aggregate score spans 28x across five backbones at 10% of the training data (0.24 to 6.79) and collapses to a 1.9x range at full data, while threshold-free mAP stays within 1.28x over the same backbones, which localises the fault to the summation step. The mechanism is the uncalibrated aggregation rule, which adds the main-branch score to half the sum of the three non-main branches; we verify it by measuring main- and non-main-branch activations. Two plain seven-dimensional sigmoid baselines (BCE, ASL) reach mAP 0.5055 and 0.5175; ASL exceeds three of the five CALE configurations and falls within 0.03 of the best. On single-label FER the gain over a seven-dimensional baseline is nominally significant (paired t-test, p = 0.0436) but does not survive Benjamini-Hochberg correction (p_BH = 0.2055) or a Wilcoxon test (p = 0.1250). We conclude that sum-based label expansion requires threshold calibration at the deployment data scale, or a learned aggregation, before it can support multi-label decisions.

翻译：暂无翻译