A recent perspective paper by Kazanina & Tavano (referred to as the KT perspective in the following) argues how neural oscillations cannot provide a potential neural correlate for syntactic structure building. The view that neural oscillations can provide a potential neural correlate for syntactic structure building is largely attributed to a study by Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, and Poeppel in 2016 (referred to as the DMZTP study). The KT perspective is thought provoking, but has severe misinterpretations about the arguments in DMZTP and other studies, and contains contradictory conclusions in different parts of the perspective, making it impossible to understand the position of the authors. In the following, I summarize a few misinterpretations and inconsistent arguments in the KT perspective, and put forward a few suggestions for future studies.

翻译：Kazanina & Tavano(以下称为KT观点)最近发表的一篇观点文件(以下称为KT观点)指出,神经振荡如何不能为合成结构建设提供潜在的神经相关关系,认为神经振荡可以为合成结构建设提供潜在的神经相关关系,这在很大程度上归因于2016年Ding、Melloni、Zhang、Tian和Poeppel(即DMZTP研究)的一项研究。 KT观点被认为引人深思,但对DMZTP和其他研究中的论点有严重的误解,并包含不同部分的自相矛盾的结论,使得无法理解作者的立场。 在下文,我总结了KT观点中的一些误解和不一致的论点,并为未来研究提出了一些建议。