A probability used for a decision should refer to the same event across equivalent requests. We introduce probability contracts, a benchmark connecting exact finite-world posteriors, validated event transformations, and failure-aware decision evaluation. Four model-interface configurations are evaluated on 1,000 worlds. Their assessments differ across accuracy, coherence, and decision loss: Kev has lower aggregate canonical posterior error than Jev, but larger complement and coarsening residuals, with accuracy ordering varying by stratum. Jev's Event and Choice interfaces induce different binary actions on 32.8% of valid pairs at defer cost 0.10. A post-hoc analysis finds that disagreement certifies only 11-52% of mean binary pair error across configurations. An elementary action-region characterization explains when averaging changes decision loss relative to randomly selecting one interface. Although averaging cannot worsen that baseline's expected Brier score, its decision effect depends on the cost and crossed boundaries; the observed same-baseline penalties occur in configurations already worse than always deferring. The benchmark makes these distinctions measurable without treating consistency as accuracy or a score improvement as a decision guarantee.

翻译：暂无翻译