The emergent abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), which power tools like ChatGPT and Bard, have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing. In response to rising concerns about AI use, authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts, and journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services, as many teachers have done with student writing in class settings. Given these looming possibilities, we investigate whether academics view it as necessary to report AI use in manuscript preparation and how detectors react to the use of AI in academic writing.

翻译：大语言模型（LLMs）作为驱动ChatGPT和Bard等工具的核心技术，其涌现能力引发了学界对AI如何影响学术写作的热议与忧虑。为应对AI使用日益增长的关注，学术出版物作者可能决定自愿披露其在稿件修订中使用的任何AI工具，而期刊与学术会议或将开始强制要求披露，抑或转而采用检测服务——正如众多教师在课堂情境中对待学生写作那样。基于这些可能到来的趋势，本研究探讨了学者是否认为有必要在稿件准备中报告AI使用情况，以及检测器对学术写作中AI应用的响应机制。