In cohort studies, a clinical outcome sometimes cannot be measured at a patient's visit when a resource-intensive measurement is skipped, and a prediction interval provides a range of values the unmeasured outcome may plausibly take, reported with the prediction level. Constructing the interval requires knowing how far the patient's disease has advanced, and a time-to-event covariate, the time until an anchoring event common to all patients, places each patient at a comparable point in the disease. For many patients, however, this event has not occurred by the end of their follow-up, so the time-to-event covariate is right-censored: its value is not observed and is known only to exceed the time to study exit. Conformal prediction methods can be adapted to this right-censored covariate setting, but these methods produce intervals whose length and coverage rate vary substantially from study to study. Such variability cannot support reliable clinical decisions, since the outcome range would overly depend on the study sample rather than on the true disease process. We develop a semiparametric prediction method that recasts the construction of the prediction interval as semiparametric estimation of its half-length, using the distributional information that conformal prediction methods discard. The method achieves the smallest possible variance in the estimated half-length and remains consistent even when the model for the time-to-event covariate or the model for the censoring time is misspecified. Simulation studies confirm substantially more stable interval lengths and coverage rates than conformal prediction methods across censoring rates. In a Huntington disease study with 77.2\% censoring, our method achieves reliable coverage with stable interval lengths, while conformal prediction methods produce either persistent undercoverage or intervals too wide to be informative.


翻译:暂无翻译

0
下载
关闭预览

相关内容

Hierarchically Structured Meta-learning
CreateAMind
27+阅读 · 2019年5月22日
Transferring Knowledge across Learning Processes
CreateAMind
29+阅读 · 2019年5月18日
论文浅尝 | Interaction Embeddings for Prediction and Explanation
开放知识图谱
11+阅读 · 2019年2月1日
A Technical Overview of AI & ML in 2018 & Trends for 2019
待字闺中
18+阅读 · 2018年12月24日
《pyramid Attention Network for Semantic Segmentation》
统计学习与视觉计算组
44+阅读 · 2018年8月30日
跨越注意力:Cross-Attention
我爱读PAMI
172+阅读 · 2018年6月2日
论文浅尝 | Improved Neural Relation Detection for KBQA
开放知识图谱
13+阅读 · 2018年1月21日
国家自然科学基金
0+阅读 · 2015年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
0+阅读 · 2015年12月31日
VIP会员
最新内容
何为协作武器?
专知会员服务
6+阅读 · 9月1日
《理解认知战:超越信息》
专知会员服务
10+阅读 · 9月1日
美国战争部在GenAI.mil上推出OpenAI的ChatGPT Mil
专知会员服务
8+阅读 · 8月31日
人工智能赋能军事维护:重新定义国防战备
专知会员服务
4+阅读 · 8月31日
《美陆军野战手册(2026年):特种部队》
专知会员服务
6+阅读 · 8月31日
受限仓库多智能体取送中的动态安全等待点选择
相关VIP内容
相关资讯
Hierarchically Structured Meta-learning
CreateAMind
27+阅读 · 2019年5月22日
Transferring Knowledge across Learning Processes
CreateAMind
29+阅读 · 2019年5月18日
论文浅尝 | Interaction Embeddings for Prediction and Explanation
开放知识图谱
11+阅读 · 2019年2月1日
A Technical Overview of AI & ML in 2018 & Trends for 2019
待字闺中
18+阅读 · 2018年12月24日
《pyramid Attention Network for Semantic Segmentation》
统计学习与视觉计算组
44+阅读 · 2018年8月30日
跨越注意力:Cross-Attention
我爱读PAMI
172+阅读 · 2018年6月2日
论文浅尝 | Improved Neural Relation Detection for KBQA
开放知识图谱
13+阅读 · 2018年1月21日
Top
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员