Rubric hacking limits both performance and training robustness in rubric-based reinforcement learning. By decomposing rubrics into sub-dimensions, we reveal the Intra-Rubric Reward Divergence: as the total rubric score increases, certain sub-dimension scores systematically decrease, suggesting the model sacrifices specific quality aspects to optimize the aggregated objective. From the sub-dimension perspective, we observe two phenomena: (1) dimension imbalance, causing the policy to favor heavily covered dimensions; (2) dimension absence, leading to a systematic gap between rewards and true quality. To mitigate these issues, we propose Fair-Race Dimension Aggregation (FRDA), which has generations compete within each dimension separately to mitigate rubric imbalance, and Residual Semantic Dimension Completion (RSDC), which mines evaluation dimensions implicitly encoded in a holistic preference signal to complete rubric coverage. Experiments in chat, science, and medical domains indicate that FRDA mitigates rubric hacking with more stable improvements, while RSDC outperforms both single-reward training and naive multi-reward aggregation, yielding generally higher-quality responses.

翻译：暂无翻译