This work introduces a general obstructional framework, the "Double Bind," exposing intrinsic structural limitations of formal verification across computational complexity, mathematical physics and broader theoretical domains. Structurally, it operates as a nested case-switch mechanism: its two primary branches (horns) never activate simultaneously, nor are both guaranteed to trigger, while the first contains a nested switch where exactly one specific case is activated. We demonstrate how the expectation of a formally verifiable proof regarding SAT solver complexity (e.g., via Coq) conflicts with the fundamental limits of computation. While this suggests the logical undecidability of the P vs NP problem, the Double Bind framework resolves the apparent paradox. This obstruction encompasses all standard complexity barriers, such as relativization, natural proofs, and algebrization, while fundamentally blocking a vast class of potential future proof strategies not covered by traditional limitations. To establish its universality, we derive a second formulation via a prefix-closure topology on Deterministic Turing Machine programs and Kolmogorov complexity. This leads to the "Principle of General Non-Measurability," proving that such computational double binds stem from a deep, invariant geometric structure. We show that this framework governs a wide class of foundational limits, analyzing its implications across Geometric Complexity Theory (GCT), the certification of the Langlands program, cryptography, and the theoretical boundaries of quantum supremacy. Finally, we expose a hidden, correlated assumption within the theory of one-way functions. Given the subtle architecture of the framework, the introductory sections provide an essential narrative disambiguation to explicitly separate it from conventional misapplications of Rice's theorem.

翻译：暂无翻译