Large Language Models (LLMs) have lately been on the spotlight of researchers, businesses, and consumers alike. While the linguistic capabilities of such models have been studied extensively, there is growing interest in investigating them as cognitive subjects. In the present work I examine GPT-3 and ChatGPT capabilities on an limited-data inductive reasoning task from the cognitive science literature. The results suggest that these models' cognitive judgements are not human-like.

翻译：大型语言模型（LLMs）近来已成为研究人员、企业和消费者关注的焦点。尽管此类模型的语言能力已被广泛研究，但将其作为认知主体进行探讨的兴趣日益增长。在本研究中，我考察了GPT-3和ChatGPT在认知科学文献中一项有限数据归纳推理任务上的能力。结果表明，这些模型的认知判断并不具备类人特征。