Web agents extend LLMs from text generation to real-world web interaction by relying on execution harnesses that interpret user goals, perceive webpages, plan actions, and ground model decisions into browser operations. While prior work has recognized that agent security depends on more than the backend model alone, how harness design quantitatively shapes web-agent security remains insufficiently measured. To systematically study web-agent harness security, we first characterize web-agent harnesses as a four-stage execution workflow covering goal interpretation, webpage perception, reasoning and planning, and action execution. Based on this abstraction, we build WebTrap Farm, a systematic and extensible evaluation framework covering three representative attack categories: malicious user prompts, malicious prompt injection, and deceptive web design. To avoid conflating security with task capability, we use paired usability calibration tasks to separate genuine defensive behavior from capability limitations. Our evaluation shows that existing web-agent harnesses remain vulnerable to typical attacks, with some unsafe behaviors occurring even without explicit attack content, revealing harness-intrinsic security failures (RQ1). Statistical analysis further shows that both harness and backend model significantly affect security outcomes, indicating that deployed-agent security is jointly shaped by the harness and backend model (RQ2). Finally, we localize where defensive behavior emerges across workflow stages and identify more secure design mechanisms, providing actionable guidance for building more robust web agents (RQ3). These findings highlight the web-agent harness as an important security boundary and motivate moving beyond model-centric defenses toward harness-level security design.

翻译：暂无翻译