In ultra-high-resolution (UHR) remote sensing images, the objects that questions count in a region or relate by direction often span only a few pixels. Existing methods mainly decide where a vision-language model (VLM) should look and trust its answer in the chosen view. We show that this assumption fails for counting, and measure VLMs as one calibrates a sensor. All eight open VLMs tested fall increasingly short once a view holds more than a certain number of objects, about five for most on DOTA aerial images. This counting horizon narrows as views grow and objects appear smaller. An empirical power-law response model predicts the undercount a split recovers and the spurious counts it adds, and supports the rule of splitting only views beyond the horizon. In GeoScope, a text-only language model parses the question into a typed spatial program that fixes the region and its resolution. The VLM only grounds and counts within its operating range, and directions are computed explicitly from the grounded boxes. To our knowledge, it is the first UHR method to split views by a measured limit of the VLM. Without training, it improves Qwen3-VL-8B by 16.3 points on regional counting and 10.5 on spatial relations in XLRS-Bench, and has the highest reported accuracy, trained methods included, on regional counting and on the whole benchmark by question. On UHR-Micro it improves global and regional counting by 16.8 and 36.2 points, 15.6 of the former from splitting. On MME-RealWorld counting it gains 11.4 points, and we show that an option that is almost never correct yet often chosen distorts comparisons there. Project page: https://avalon-s.github.io/GeoScope/

翻译：暂无翻译