Medical foundation models (Med-FMs) are increasingly adapted to clinical tasks through prompt learning, which tunes a small set of prompt tokens while the backbone remains frozen. Recent work has shown that this efficiency introduces a vulnerability: jointly optimizing learnable prompts and an imperceptible noise trigger during few-shot adaptation implants a backdoor that leaves clean performance intact but steers triggered inputs to an attacker-chosen class. Since prompts are compact and readily shared, this raises two questions: whether a backdoored prompt remains effective on a different Med-FM, and whether it can be repaired without retraining the backbone. We address both in BAPLe++. First, we present the first study of cross-model transferability of prompt-based backdoors, quantified by two proposed metrics, Clean Accuracy Difference (CAD) and Backdoor Accuracy Difference (BAD). Second, we propose DePLe (Defense via Prompt Learning), which uses the infected prompt as a fixed anchor and learns a new prompt on a small clean set that preserves the clean task while diverging from the compromised embedding region. Experiments on four Med-FMs and six chest X-ray and histopathology datasets show that backdoors transfer across models, but asymmetrically and in a dataset-dependent manner. Compared with four training-free input transformations, DePLe reduces backdoor accuracy more consistently while preserving, and in several settings improving, clean accuracy. Our code can be accessed on https://github.com/Ufaqkhan/Baple-Plus-Plus

翻译：暂无翻译