High-fidelity (HF) simulations of parametric partial differential equations are expensive, whereas low-fidelity (LF) models such as coarse grids or simplified physics are cheap but biased. Multi-fidelity physics-informed neural networks combine the two, yet it remains unclear when cheap physics actually reduces the number of HF solves, and existing methods silently fail when the LF model is misleading and offer no guaranteed uncertainty. We answer the first question with a sharp sample-complexity bound: learning the HF field through its discrepancy from the LF model reduces the number of HF samples needed for accuracy $\varepsilon$ by the factor $κ^{2γ}$, where $κ$ is the ratio of the complexity of the discrepancy to that of the HF field and $γ$ is the effective-dimension exponent, and we confirm the predicted scaling with exact risk computations in a kernel model. Guided by the analysis, we propose GaMF-PINN, a gated multi-fidelity PINN that learns where to trust the LF model and falls back to physics-only learning where it does not, together with a function-level conformal procedure that returns uncertainty bands containing the entire HF solution with probability at least $1-α$ in finite samples. We release MFPDE-Bench, an open benchmark of paired LF/HF solvers for four parametric PDEs with coarse-grid and simplified-physics LF models. Across MFPDE-Bench, GaMF-PINN reaches the accuracy of a standard HF-PINN with up to 8x fewer HF solves, remains robust when the LF model is deliberately corrupted, and attains the nominal coverage where Bayesian PINNs and deep ensembles under-cover.

翻译：暂无翻译