Deploying large language models (LLMs) under a fixed accelerator budget requires jointly deciding how computational capacity is allocated across model sizes and how incoming requests are routed across that capacity. Although prior work has extensively studied LLM routing and serving efficiency, the relative importance of fleet composition and routing under resource constraints remains less understood. We investigate this question using a controlled four-GPU serving environment with heterogeneous clinical NLP workloads spanning short factual verification, biomedical semantic matching, and long-context clinical summarization. We systematically vary fleet composition, routing policy, and offered load while holding the workload trace and hardware budget fixed. Across 24 configurations, descriptive main-effect shares attribute more variation to fleet composition than to the evaluated routing policies in time to first token, latency, and long-context coverage. All-small fleets provide the best responsiveness and throughput but substantially lower long-context coverage, whereas larger-model capacity improves coverage at the cost of serving efficiency. Heterogeneous fleets provide intermediate operating points but can introduce strong-model bottlenecks when large-model capacity is scarce. In a focused evaluation of this bottleneck, capacity-aware routing reduces mean latency and increases throughput while incurring a small reduction in long-context coverage. Within this measured regime, the results support prioritizing capacity allocation, with routing managing demand within the provisioned capacity.

翻译：暂无翻译