Industry practitioners and academic researchers regularly use multi-agent systems to accelerate their work, yet the frameworks through which these systems operate do not provide a simple, unified mechanism for scalably managing the critical aspects of the agent harness, impacting both the quality of individual human-agent interactions and the capacity for practitioners to coordinate toward common goals through shared agent infrastructure. Agent frameworks have enabled increasingly sophisticated multi-agent systems, but the behavioral specifications that define what these agents can do remain fragmented across prose instruction files, framework-internal configuration, and mechanisms like MCP servers that operate separately from individual agent definitions, making these specifications difficult to share, version, or collaboratively maintain across teams and projects. Applying the ALARA principle from radiation safety (exposures kept as low as reasonably achievable) to agent context, we introduce a declarative context-agent-tool (CAT) data layer expressed through interrelated files that scope each agent's tool access and context to the minimum its role requires, and \texttt{npcsh}, a command-line shell for executing it. Because the system parses and enforces these files structurally, modifying an agent's tool list produces a guaranteed behavioral change rather than a suggestion the model may or may not follow. We evaluate 22 locally-hosted models from 0.6B to 35B parameters across 115 practical tasks spanning file operations, web search, multi-step scripting, tool chaining, and multi-agent delegation, characterizing which model families succeed at which task categories and where they break down across $\sim$2500 total executions.

翻译：暂无翻译