Legal retrieval over jurisprudential collections is challenging because court decisions are long, heterogeneous documents whose relevant legal thesis may occupy only a small portion of the text. This paper asks whether legal nuggets, defined as short and self-contained legal theses extracted from source documents, can improve dense retrieval over Brazilian legal collections. We propose a pipeline that extracts nuggets from each document, indexes them with embeddings, retrieves nugget-level evidence, and aggregates the retrieved nuggets back to document-level rankings. We evaluate this approach on four Portuguese legal retrieval benchmarks from the JUA ecosystem, reporting NDCG@10, MAP@10, and MRR@10. Nugget retrieval substantially improves the two jurisprudential datasets: on JUA-Juris, NDCG@10 increases from 0.10265 to 0.20461, and on JurisTCU from 0.20898 to 0.32696. However, it underperforms full-document retrieval on NormasTCU and BR-TaxQA, and an embedding-model ablation shows that strong domain-adapted retrievers can remain better in the full-document setting. The results demonstrate that legal nuggets can be useful for jurisprudence search, especially when queries are formulated as legal theses, but they may not transfer equally well to other legal retrieval scenarios.

翻译：暂无翻译