By virtue of technology and benefit advantages, cloud computing has increasingly attracted a large number of potential cloud consumers (PCC) plan to migrate the traditional business to the cloud service. However, trust has become one of the most challenging issues that prevent the PCC from adopting cloud services, especially in trustworthy cloud service selection. Besides, due to the diversity and dynamic of quality of service (QoS) in the cloud environment, the existing trust assessment methods based on the single constant value of QoS attribute and the subjective weight assignment are not good enough to provide an effective solution for PCCs to identify and select a trustworthy cloud service among a wide range of functionally-equivalent cloud service providers (CSPs). To address the challenge, a novel assessment and selection framework for trustworthy cloud service, FASTCloud, is proposed in this study. This framework facilitates PCCs to select a trustworthy cloud service based on their actual QoS requirements. In order to accurately and efficiently assess the trust level of cloud services, a QoS-based trust assessment model is proposed. This model represents a trust level assessment method based on the interval multiple attributes with an objective weight assignment method based on the deviation maximization to adaptively determine the trust level of different cloud services provisioned by candidate CSPs. The advantage of the proposed trust level assessment method in time complexity is demonstrated by the performance analysis and comparison. The experimental result of a case study with an open-source dataset shows that the trust model is efficient in cloud service trust assessment and the FASTCloud can effectively help PCCs select a trustworthy cloud service.


翻译:暂无翻译

0
下载
关闭预览

相关内容

云服务是基于互联网的相关服务的增加、使用和交付模式,通常涉及通过互联网来提供动态易扩展且经常是虚拟化的资源。
Hierarchically Structured Meta-learning
CreateAMind
27+阅读 · 2019年5月22日
Transferring Knowledge across Learning Processes
CreateAMind
29+阅读 · 2019年5月18日
Unsupervised Learning via Meta-Learning
CreateAMind
44+阅读 · 2019年1月3日
A Technical Overview of AI & ML in 2018 & Trends for 2019
待字闺中
18+阅读 · 2018年12月24日
国家自然科学基金
0+阅读 · 2014年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
3+阅读 · 2013年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
2+阅读 · 2012年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
0+阅读 · 2009年12月31日
VIP会员
相关资讯
Hierarchically Structured Meta-learning
CreateAMind
27+阅读 · 2019年5月22日
Transferring Knowledge across Learning Processes
CreateAMind
29+阅读 · 2019年5月18日
Unsupervised Learning via Meta-Learning
CreateAMind
44+阅读 · 2019年1月3日
A Technical Overview of AI & ML in 2018 & Trends for 2019
待字闺中
18+阅读 · 2018年12月24日
相关基金
国家自然科学基金
0+阅读 · 2014年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
3+阅读 · 2013年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
2+阅读 · 2012年12月31日
国家自然科学基金
0+阅读 · 2009年12月31日
Top
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员