Open-weight LLMs are routinely fine-tuned from public repositories, yet task-specific adaptation can silently erode safety alignment inherited from instruct-tuned bases. This is a supply-chain risk when organizations ship third-party checkpoints without full re-alignment. Prior work rarely audits diverse public fine-tunes under a shared multi-axis safety-utility protocol or offers training-free mitigation at deployment time. We propose Safety Direction Adapter (SDA), a training-free post-hoc safety patch that extracts a safety direction once from an aligned base and transfers it one-to-many within that base family as a small PEFT-compatible weight update, evaluated under the same multi-axis protocol. Across six direction extractors, we evaluate 14 checkpoints from two 1-2B lineages and probe 8B and 27B fleets (n=5 each) on 15 benchmarks (12538 prompts). On Llama, SDA improves the four-axis mean by about 2.3 points against a 4.2-point instruct-relative gap (about 55 percent recovery; partial Avg), with Safety and Cyber recovering toward or beyond instruct; Safety gains about 8.5 points against about 4.9 points mean degradation. On Qwen, degradation is larger and excess-driven; SDA still lifts Avg (about 36 percent of the gap) while trading Safety and Cyber against Excess and General. We report dual-use risks of publishing direction adapters and do not claim robustness to adaptive or white-box attacks.

翻译：暂无翻译