Vision-language model (VLM) unlearning is often treated as an objective-design problem: given multimodal forget data, the goal is to optimize a loss that removes undesirable behavior while preserving retained capabilities. We argue that this view overlooks an equally important data-centric question: how should each forget example be represented before optimization? Existing methods typically keep image-conditioned failures in their original image-text form, implicitly assuming that pixels are the right route for unlearning whenever pixels appear in the input. We challenge this assumption by constructing modality-decomposed versions of VLM benchmarks, enabling controlled comparisons among image-only, text-only, and multimodal representations of the same examples. Our modality-mixing experiments show that unsafe instruction-following behavior is more effectively suppressed through textual representations than through images alone, while purely text-only unlearning can still weaken visual grounding when the target behavior depends on visual evidence. Motivated by this trade-off, we introduce ModRoute, a gradient-guided per-sample modality routing strategy that selectively converts high visual-pressure examples to text-only form while keeping the remaining examples multimodal. Notably, on VLGuard with LLaVA-1.5-7B, ModRoute has the strongest composite unlearning-utility score of 0.847 at $γ=0.5$, a 2.5% improvement over the best random-switching score and $\geq$46% better than pure multimodal or text unlearning. Overall, our results show that effective VLM unlearning depends not only on the objective, but also on the composition and per-sample modality routing of the unlearning data.

翻译：暂无翻译