When distilling reasoning from large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones, teacher rationales for similar problems often vary wildly in structure and strategy. Like a chef who makes the same dish differently each time, this inconsistency burdens the student with noisy supervision that is hard to internalize. We propose Distillation through Reasoning Path Compression (D-RPC), which constrains the teacher to follow a compact, dynamically maintained bank of reusable high-level reasoning paths. For each training question, D-RPC retrieves the most relevant path and conditions the teacher to follow it, producing rationales that are consistent across similar problems yet diverse enough to cover different problem types. A PAC-Bayes analysis formalizes a trade-off between bank size and coverage, with smaller banks limiting path diversity at the risk of coverage gaps. Our ablations favor an intermediate bank size, consistent with this trade-off. Across five math and commonsense reasoning benchmarks with two student models, D-RPC achieves the highest average accuracy among the evaluated distillation methods, while using fewer tokens than template-heavy alternatives.

翻译：暂无翻译