Quantum circuit optimization is an indispensable component of the quantum software stack, used to reduce noise, maximize performance, alleviate costs of quantum error correction, or target specific hardware. A related problem is approximate membership: for a fixed set of unitaries $S$, decide whether a given circuit $C$ is within distance $\varepsilon$ of a unitary in $S$ under some metric $m$. Membership is a special case of optimization, where $S$ is a set of unitaries implementable at no cost (e.g., with noise-minimal circuits, or without magic states). Janzing, Wocjan, and Beth (Int. J. Quantum Inf., 2005) showed that, for the operator metric, the case $S=\{I\}$ (approximate identity) is QMA-complete when $C$ is promised to be either close to the identity or far from it. We generalize this setting in three directions: (i) promise-free inputs, (ii) besides $S=\{I\}$, sets $S$ containing only Clifford unitaries, or only generalized permutation matrices (i.e., no superposition), and (iii) the trace-based, spectral, and operator metrics. We show that, in all cases, approximate membership is PP-hard for wide ranges of $\varepsilon$, provided $C$'s gate-set can implement Clifford+T, as the gate-sets of standard hardware do. If $S=\{I\}$, or if $S$ contains only generalized permutation matrices, $I\in S$, and $m$ is a trace-based distance, PP-hardness holds for all non-trivial $\varepsilon$. If $S=\{I\}$ and $m$ is a trace-based distance, PP-hardness holds even for circuits over classical-reversible gate-sets. Our results indicate that approximate membership is harder over promise-free inputs than the QMA-complete promise version, and that this hardness persists across quantum resources (any gates, non-Clifford, superposition) and distance metrics. They directly imply PP-hardness of circuit optimization when minimizing total, non-Clifford, or superposition gate depth or count.

翻译：暂无翻译