Both Superconducting and Ion-Trap are leading quantum architectures common in the current landscape of the quantum computing field, each with distinct characteristics and operational constraints. Understanding and measuring the underlying quantumness of these devices is essential for assessing their readiness for practical applications and guiding future progress and research. Building on earlier work (Meirom, Mor, Weinstein Arxiv 2505.12441), we utilize a benchmarking strategy applicable for comparing these two architectures by measuring "quantumness" directly on optimal sub-chips. Distinct from existing metrics, our approach employs rigorous binary fidelity thresholds derived from the classical limits of state transfer. This enables us to definitively establish quantum advantage of a designated sub-region. Here we apply this quality assurance methodology to platforms from both technologies. This comparison provides a protocol-based evaluation of quantumness advantage, revealing not only the strengths and weaknesses of each tested chip and its sub-chips but also offering a common language for their assessment. By abstracting away technical differences in the final result, we demonstrate a benchmarking strategy that bridges the gap between disparate quantum-circuit technologies, enabling fair performance comparisons and establishing a critical foundation for evaluating future claims of quantum advantage. This work was made possible by policies of two companies who enable independent and objective assessment on their quantum computers and sub-chips. In the name of science, we encourage other companies to emulate the independent qubit availability and the fair pricing which allow researchers to preform such assessments.

翻译：超导和离子阱是当前量子计算领域常见的两种领先量子架构，各自具有独特的特性和操作约束。理解并测量这些设备的潜在量子性，对于评估它们在实际应用中的就绪程度、指导未来进展和研究至关重要。基于前期工作（Meirom, Mor, Weinstein Arxiv 2505.12441），我们采用了一种可直接在最优子芯片上测量“量子性”的基准测试策略，用于比较这两种架构。与现有度量标准不同，我们的方法采用了源自态传输经典极限的严格二元保真度阈值。这使我们能够明确确立指定子区域的量子优势。在此，我们将这一质量保证方法应用于两种技术的平台。这一比较提供了基于协议的量子性优势评估，不仅揭示了每个被测试芯片及其子芯片的优势与劣势，还为其评估提供了一种通用语言。通过在最终结果中抽象化技术差异，我们展示了一种能弥合不同量子电路技术差距的基准测试策略，从而能够进行公平的性能比较，并为评估未来关于量子优势的主张奠定关键基础。本工作得益于两家公司的政策，它们允许对其量子计算机和子芯片进行独立客观的评估。本着科学精神，我们鼓励其他公司效仿提供独立量子比特可用性和公平定价，以使研究人员能够进行此类评估。