Layered cybersecurity pipelines transform evidence before they decide on it, and the order of those transformations determines which security facts become visible to which layer. This paper gives layer order a finite-state semantics built from a layer-order automaton, deterministic sequential security transducers, evidence markers, and a final decision automaton. The worked case is HTTP request desynchronization: front-end and back-end processors compute incompatible request boundaries, and the same trace is detected or missed according to whether framing evidence reaches the parser-differential layer before it commits. The results separate completed-trace recognition, online editing, decision synthesis, and faithful enforcement; characterize faithful online enforcement as the regular prefix-closed case under causal visibility; and show that regular policies beyond that boundary remain recognizable without becoming deployable enforcers. The framework is monolithically equivalent to finite-output deterministic edit automata, while preserving layer-local invariants such as marker birth, marker survival, and reorder-sensitive visibility. A concrete parser-pair semantics identifies the forbidden marker factor with CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE, and HTTP/2-downgrade boundary disagreement under the stated abstraction, and a contextual reorder congruence classifies which component permutations induce the same decision language. The result is an automata-theoretic account of order-sensitive security failures and a compositional vocabulary for auditing, synthesizing, and comparing layered enforcement pipelines.

翻译：暂无翻译