The development of privacy-enhancing technologies has made immense progress in reducing trade-offs between privacy and performance in data exchange and analysis. Similar tools for structured transparency could be useful for AI governance by offering capabilities such as external scrutiny, auditing, and source verification. It is useful to view these different AI governance objectives as a system of information flows in order to avoid partial solutions and significant gaps in governance, as there may be significant overlap in the software stacks needed for the AI governance use cases mentioned in this text. When viewing the system as a whole, the importance of interoperability between these different AI governance solutions becomes clear. Therefore, it is imminently important to look at these problems in AI governance as a system, before these standards, auditing procedures, software, and norms settle into place.

翻译：加强隐私技术的发展在减少隐私与数据交换和分析绩效之间的取舍方面取得了巨大进展。类似的结构化透明度工具可以通过提供外部审查、审计和源核查等能力,对大赦国际的治理有用。将大赦国际的这些不同的治理目标视为信息流动系统是有益的,以避免部分解决方案和治理方面的重大差距,因为本案文中提到的大赦国际治理使用案例所需的软件堆积可能有很大重叠。当整体看待整个系统时,这些不同的大赦国际治理解决方案之间互操作性的重要性变得十分明确。因此,在这些标准、审计程序、软件和规范到位之前,将大赦国际治理中的这些问题视为一个系统,是迫在眉睫的。</s>